- About Regulatory Services
- Import/Export Permits
- Information for Licence Applicants
- Information for Licence Holders
- Regulatory Guides
- Regulatory Forms
- Transport of Radioactive Material
- Holistic Safety
- State & Territory Regulators
- Security of Sources
- International Best Practice
- Radioactive Waste Disposal and Storage
- Documentation/record keeping
- Organisation and communication
- Individual people issues
- Equipment facility issues
- Good practices
- Post-Inspection Survey Results
Information is provided on the common areas for improvement identified during 2015-16 to help licence holders review the issues and identify potential strategies to address their causes.
Processes or procedures not reviewed
Forty-four percent of the areas for improvement related to documentation, poor record keeping or review practices.
Regular review of processes, procedures and instructions is an important part of any safety system. The review and upkeep of documents demonstrates that risks of activities continue to be adequately controlled and that work is undertaken as designed.
Work places are dynamic environments where personnel, equipment and work requirements change. Work practices tend to drift from how they were originally designed as people perceive easier, more efficient and better ways to complete tasks or adapt to new equipment and work demands. Where processes or conditions have changed without proper evaluation and documentation, risks may not be identified or properly controlled. There are many examples where this has unknowingly led to unsafe practices or accidents.
Strategies for improving and maintaining effective document control include:
- Implement a robust document management system/software which identifies the date when each document is due for review and who is responsible for the document. This may also help to reinforce personal ownership of documentation.
- Implement workplace audit programs to verify that work is undertaken as specified in procedures and instructions.
- Perform a ‘needs analysis’ to ensure all relevant stakeholders review procedures which affect them.
- Raise the importance of regularly reviewing documentation, such as though the use of key performance indicators or attention at senior meetings.
- Promote a workplace culture in which processes, procedures and instructions are followed accurately but, where ideas for improvement are welcomed and implemented with awareness and management of any related risks and opportunities.
Organisation and communication
Poor risk assessment or hazard identification
Twenty one percent of the issues identified related to poor risk assessment or hazard identification.
Organisations need to have a wide range of measures to identify and control risks and hazards. However, even with high-level controls, some risks can easily be missed as they can depend on specific situations and changing processes. People should be actively identifying and assessing risks as part of their normal work and feel empowered to stop activities they consider unsafe.
Strategies to promote risk assessments across the organisation include:
- Use formal tools such as: Task/Job Hazard Analysis (THA/JSA), change management processes, regular risk reviews
- Use informal tools such as: Take 5, HAZOB, Pre-start checks, Toolbox meetings
- Regularly review operating experience and promote curiosity when things do not happen as expected, even when there is a good outcome
- Create, use and disseminate information such as risk registers and organisational learnings
Australian New Zealand Standard AS NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management – Principles and guidelines provides useful information on managing risk in the workplace.Top of Page
Individual people issues
Procedures are not always followed
There can be many reasons why a procedure was not followed. Even the best people make mistakes. Error is a human trait and it is often stated that a skilled manual worker will make five to seven errors per hour whilst the error rate for people involved in knowledge based work with ideas and concepts is three times higher.
Deviation from procedures may also be deliberate, although it is seldom of malicious intent. People may find that a procedure is poorly designed and cannot be followed completely. People are flexible and intelligent beings with a natural tendency to find and implement easier, more efficient ways of working. A danger of this type of deviation is that it may be undertaken without adequate awareness of the safety implications. Research also shows that human experts make consistent errors in judgement about uncertainty and risk.
Careful consideration of the circumstances which led to people not following procedures could uncover some important underlying issues. Strategies for addressing deviations from procedures include:
- Review procedures taking into account human factors. Where the workplace, equipment and procedures are designed with the user in mind, taking account of human capabilities and limitations, people can work effectively with technology. This can reduce the likelihood that workers deviate from a defined procedure because they think that there is a better or more efficient way to perform the job.
- Review change management and document control measures to ensure that where processes are changed, procedures are also updated.
- Review workplace training and supervision arrangements, with a focus on ensuring that all staff are sufficiently familiar with a task or procedure. See staff training section below.
- Promote safety culture across all layers of the organisation to ensure that unhealthy workplace cultures do not affect individual’s performance. For example, production pressure can cause the perception that production is more important than following procedures or safety requirements.
Inadequate staff training
Training is important to provide people with the skills, knowledge and attitudes required to safely perform their job. This can be particularly important for new staff and for rarely performed tasks including emergency response. Strategies to implement a systematic approach to training include:
- Perform a training needs analysis to identify the competencies and experience required to perform particular tasks or roles.
- Implement software to track training and staff competencies, and capture training needs at an individual level.
- Implement formal teaching and mentoring systems in the workplace to help promote teamwork and share lessons.
- Implement or review succession planning and business continuity arrangements to ensure that critical skills are not held by only one or two people in an organisation.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of existing training to ensure that training is relevant to the tasks being performed.
Equipment facility issues
Labelling issues/warning signage
Sixteen percent of the areas for improvement related to labelling and signage.
Accurate warning signage such as the radiation trefoil, or labels such as ‘Class IIIb laser’, is important to ensure that users are aware of the hazards in the workplace. Strategies for improving signage control could include:
- Document the signage needs in workplace procedures or management plans. These requirements should relate to specific relevant standards – for example, in a laboratory requirements may include AS2243.4, AS2243.5 and AS1319.
- Perform regular audits of signage in the workplace; this could be part of monthly/quarterly safety checks.
A power cable lockout mechanism can provide effective, low cost, access control for equipment that is portable or stored in a public area. At one site this mechanism was used by a Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) retaining the key, which was then signed out to individual users; thus ensuring only trained and authorised staff were able to access to the equipment. The RSO also kept a log of users and the current location of the device.
Risk assessment app
Risk awareness can be made more accessible through the appropriate use of technology. One organisation has developed, and promoted the use of, a ‘Take 5’ risk assessment app for smart phones. This allows assessments to be easily conducted in the field using people’s existing phones. This system could also effectively maintain digital records of these informal assessments.
Post-inspection survey results
Following each inspection, the licence holder was independently requested to complete an online survey to provide feedback on the inspection process. In 2015-16 positive feedback outweighed negative feedback.
Based on feedback and suggestions received, ARPANSA has made the following improvements:
- Introduced ‘complex site’ inspections which cover multiple licence holders at a single location
- Changed ‘performance deficiencies’ to ‘areas for improvement’.